• 企業情報
  • SIパートナー
  • 新卒採用
  • 中途採用
  • English
  • HOME
  • マシンビジョン

    • 画像処理ソフトウェア
      • MVTec Software | HALCON
      • MVTec Software | MERLIC
      • MVTec Software | DeepLearningTool
    • 産業用デジタルカメラ
      • iRAYPLE
      • Teledyne DALSA
      • Basler
    • サイエンスカメラ
      • Teledyne Photometorics
    • 産業用カメラレンズ
    • オートフォーカスモジュール
    • 画像入力ボード
    • コードリーダ

    スマートセンサー

    • 3次元センサー
      • LMI Technologies | Gocator
      • Allied Vision Konstanz(旧 Chromasens)
      • heliotis
      • Photoneo

    ロボティクス

    • 自律走行搬送ロボット(AMR/AGF)
      • iRAYPLE

    産業用コントローラ

    • ソフトウェアPLC / モーション / HMI
      • CODESYS
    • IIoT対応 CODESYS搭載PLC
      • TRITON

    エンベデッドソリューション

    • エンベデッドソリューション
    全ての製品
  • 事例一覧

    分野別事例

      • 半導体/IC
      • 物流・パッケージ
      • 樹脂/セラミックス/フィルム
      • 医療/製薬
      • 製造業
      • 自動車
      • 金属/加工
      • 農業/食品

    製品別事例

      • Basler
      • GINGA
      • Gocator
      • CODESYS
      • HALCON
      • heliotis
      • エンベデッドビジョン
  • ソリューション
  • SIパートナー
  • 使いたい

      • 無料2Dカメラデモ機貸出サービス
      • 無料3Dセンサー計測評価サービス
      • 無料コードリーダデモ機貸出サービス

    相談したい

      • 各種サポート問い合わせ

    知りたい

      • イベントカレンダー
      • FAQ
      • トレーニング動画
         HALCON / MERLIC
      • トレーニング動画
         Teledyne
      • トレーニング動画
         3DセンサーGocator入門コース
      • トレーニング動画
         iRAYPLE AMR
      • トレーニング
         CODESYS
      • お役立ち情報 物流コラム
      • お役立ち情報 マシンビジョンコラム
ダウンロード お問合せ・お見積り
企業情報 EN
新卒採用 中途採用

Logotype Michael Evamy May 2026

Use this checklist to critique a logotype design:

Perhaps the most valuable contribution of Logotype is something Evamy calls the "proportional ladder." In an interview about the book, he noted that most designers struggle with distribution—how much space to put between letters (tracking/kerning) and between strokes within a letter.

The book visually codifies this. Evamy ranks logotypes based on their "typographic color" (the density of black versus white space). He contrasts the hairline delicacy of fashion logos (Chanel, YSL) against the brutal chunky weight of industrial logos (Caterpillar, Jeep). Logotype Michael Evamy

By comparing marks side-by-side on a proportional scale, Evamy teaches the reader that a logotype is not a static object; it is a balance of forces. The tension between thick and thin, open and closed, curve and straight line dictates whether the brand feels "luxury" or "discount."

One of the book’s most cited spreads compares four variations of the lowercase 'e' across different famous wordmarks. The tilt, the terminal, and the size of the counter literally change the brand’s personality. Evamy argues that a shift of two millimeters in the arm of the 'e' can move a brand from "playful" to "incompetent." Use this checklist to critique a logotype design:


The practical feature that elevates Logotype from coffee-table ornament to studio bible is its indexing. Need a logotype that uses a chiseled serif for a whiskey brand? Turn to the "Serif: Wedge" section. Looking for a stencil logotype for an automotive client? There is a curated grid for that.

Evamy refuses to offer subjective praise ("This logo is beautiful"). Instead, he offers blueprints. He isolates the logotype from its business card mockups and Instagram shadows, rendering it down to pure form. Don’t:

What makes the keyword "Logotype Michael Evamy" so searchable is the book’s obsessive organization. This is not a book you read cover-to-cover; it is a reference tool. Evamy broke down the universe of wordmarks into logical, visual categories.

The book is structured not by chronology, but by visual taxonomy. This approach allows the reader to see connections between different eras and industries based on stylistic execution.

In the pantheon of design reference books, most are aspirational — full of gleaming mock-ups, theoretical grids, and art-school projects that never saw a checkout lane. But Michael Evamy’s Logotype is different. It’s a field guide to the visual noise you’ve already absorbed.

First published in 2012 (and updated since), Logotype isn’t really a "how-to" book. It’s a "how-they-did" book. Evamy, a design writer and critic, set out to do something quietly radical: catalog the world’s most effective wordmarks not by beauty alone, but by structure, behavior, and cultural footprint.

  • Don’t:
  • LINX

    株式会社リンクスは、最先端の技術を世界中から誰よりも早く発掘し、技術力と経験をもって製造現場に実装する、テクノロジープロバイダです

    • HOME
    • お知らせ
    • LINX Express
    • 製品情報
    • 事例
    • ソリューション
    • SIパートナー
    • イベント
    • ダウンロード
    • FAQ
    • お問い合わせ
    • 企業情報
    • 新卒採用
    • 中途採用
    • English

    個人情報保護法 情報

    セキュリティ基本方針

    Copyright © LINX Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

    © 2026 — Studiokit

    当ウェブサイトではサイトの利便性の向上、および利用分析を目的にCookie(クッキー)を使用しています。Cookieの使用に同意いただける場合は、「同意する」をクリックしてください。当社で利用するCookieについての詳細は[個人情報保護方針]についてをご覧ください。This website uses Cookies to provide a better experience and to analyze how our sites are used. If you agree to our use of cookies, please click "Agree". Please read our Privacy Policy to learn more.
    Cookie SettingsAgree
    Manage consent

    Use this checklist to critique a logotype design:

    Perhaps the most valuable contribution of Logotype is something Evamy calls the "proportional ladder." In an interview about the book, he noted that most designers struggle with distribution—how much space to put between letters (tracking/kerning) and between strokes within a letter.

    The book visually codifies this. Evamy ranks logotypes based on their "typographic color" (the density of black versus white space). He contrasts the hairline delicacy of fashion logos (Chanel, YSL) against the brutal chunky weight of industrial logos (Caterpillar, Jeep).

    By comparing marks side-by-side on a proportional scale, Evamy teaches the reader that a logotype is not a static object; it is a balance of forces. The tension between thick and thin, open and closed, curve and straight line dictates whether the brand feels "luxury" or "discount."

    One of the book’s most cited spreads compares four variations of the lowercase 'e' across different famous wordmarks. The tilt, the terminal, and the size of the counter literally change the brand’s personality. Evamy argues that a shift of two millimeters in the arm of the 'e' can move a brand from "playful" to "incompetent."


    The practical feature that elevates Logotype from coffee-table ornament to studio bible is its indexing. Need a logotype that uses a chiseled serif for a whiskey brand? Turn to the "Serif: Wedge" section. Looking for a stencil logotype for an automotive client? There is a curated grid for that.

    Evamy refuses to offer subjective praise ("This logo is beautiful"). Instead, he offers blueprints. He isolates the logotype from its business card mockups and Instagram shadows, rendering it down to pure form.

    What makes the keyword "Logotype Michael Evamy" so searchable is the book’s obsessive organization. This is not a book you read cover-to-cover; it is a reference tool. Evamy broke down the universe of wordmarks into logical, visual categories.

    The book is structured not by chronology, but by visual taxonomy. This approach allows the reader to see connections between different eras and industries based on stylistic execution.

    In the pantheon of design reference books, most are aspirational — full of gleaming mock-ups, theoretical grids, and art-school projects that never saw a checkout lane. But Michael Evamy’s Logotype is different. It’s a field guide to the visual noise you’ve already absorbed.

    First published in 2012 (and updated since), Logotype isn’t really a "how-to" book. It’s a "how-they-did" book. Evamy, a design writer and critic, set out to do something quietly radical: catalog the world’s most effective wordmarks not by beauty alone, but by structure, behavior, and cultural footprint.

  • Don’t: