S Top — Shoplyfter Hazel Moore Case No 7906253

The DTSA defines misappropriation as “the acquisition of a trade secret by a person who knows or has reason to know that the trade secret was acquired by improper means.” The forensic report showed that Moore transferred the files without authorization and that the timestamps corresponded with her final days at Shoplyfter.

Judge Chen held that Moore’s knowledge of the NDIAA and the confidentiality designation gave her the requisite “knowledge or reason to know” for misappropriation. The copying of code into Mercury’s product constituted use of the trade secret, satisfying the DTSA’s misappropriation element. shoplyfter hazel moore case no 7906253 s top

Outline the timeline of the case up to the present moment. Use bullet points for clarity. The DTSA defines misappropriation as “the acquisition of

(If any of these steps have not yet occurred, simply omit or note “Not yet filed.”) (If any of these steps have not yet

---

Insert the factual background that the parties rely on. Use neutral language and cite sources when possible.

(If you do not yet have these facts, replace this section with a note such as “Details pending review of the docket.”)

---